Chuck Norris is my opinion sucks balls compared to Steven Segal. Tell me what you think.

Here is a video of each of them fighting in a movie. Chuck Norris Vid first. Segal is best for last.

Chuck :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxhU8CWdUIM

Steven:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDDUJnYdGmo


Choose :icon_2gun. Choose Steven

well i think segal would for sure win in a fight but both there movies suck anyway.

Bruce would tap a keg of whoopass on both of them.
http://scienceblogs.com/clock/upload/2006/10/bruce%20lee%20beats%20up%20chuck%20norris.jpg

chuck, his movies aren't half as bad as segal's (& that means something:tongue:)

Chuck.. he'll roundhousekick ur in the face if you don't vote for him :(

Chuck Norris= Jesus on steroids

I vote steven, he has a fluent style but honestly...I gotta give it to both of them, they both have really good styles, and have had really good shows as well. Seagal is just my fav out of them both.
BUT I really want to watch a good chuck movie...anyone have any in mind?

are you ****ing kidding me?

CHUCK NORRIS WILL EAT YOU.

Nahh man any of you look them up. Segal is like 6,7 and does akido.

Chuck Norris will eat Steven Segal ALIVE for breakfast :|

you never see jokes about Segal or shirts about him either

Chuck only acts tough. Steven will really kick your ass! As proved here- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu7aauJuQHY

Chuck only acts tough. Steven will really kick your ass! As proved here- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu7aauJuQHY

Right you are my man. Chuck is a short man and i respect him he's good at karate and trained with master lee but who gives a ratsass when segal moved to japan learned japanese and can actually kill a man.

Chuck Norris, he has the advantage of the fist under the beard.

Short answer: Norris.

Long answer: Back in the late 70's, early 80's, Chuck was always considered the 3rd rung of the Stallone/Arnold/Norris ladder of action heroes. After that, you'd see guys like Dolf and Jeff Speakman, but that's beside the point. Hell, even David Carradine and Tommy Lee Jones and the aging Charles Bronson were doing b-level action films to fit the genre'. When cable hit, you could always find the Octagon or Good Guys Wear Black on a Saturday night. After a bit, Chuck sort of saw that he was soon becoming a self parody, and did his thing with his dojo, infomercials and raising a family. From all accounts, he's a decent and approachable kind of guy that still, to this day, practices his craft while enjoying a popularity in retro-kitsch. Segal, on the other hand, does horrible interviews, has gotten fat and really only has Under Siege as a decent title. And let's face it...Under Siege was only good because of how much fun the bad guys had playing the role. Sorry if I've ticked off any Segal fans, but go watch Silent Rage and see the one and only Chuck Norris mix the slasher/stalker/cop-buddy/romantic comedy/biker flick/Frankenstein storyline into one neat package.

Steven Segal may have gouged Tommy-Lee Jones's eye out, but that's nothing compared to having a beard...

Norris smokes Segal in his sleep.

peronally i like chuck norris more out of the 2

but over all (this doenst go with your poll)

jet li

What about Macgyver? :)

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Macgyver

Out of the.. Chuck Norris.
Chuck Norris once bought some food at the store.. No one survived.
Chuck Norris makes the garlic cry.
Chuck Norris usually sends MMS's with morse-signals.

screw Macgyver!

Chuck would win by a long shot.

chuck norris

JLO1YIWQuXE
Chuck > Segal, but Bruce > Chuck.